It is an uncomfortable question for an industry built around understanding people.
Marketing has become exceptionally good at identifying what people want. But perhaps the more important question is whether what people want actually fulfils what they need.
Need is not the same as desire
Human needs are fundamental: protection, affection, identity, freedom, participation, understanding, leisure, creation and subsistence.
Desires are different. They are urges we experience when we perceive something to be missing.
And this is where marketing becomes powerful.
A need for connection can become a desire for a particular product.
A need for identity can become a desire for a particular brand.
A need for belonging can become a desire for a particular lifestyle.
The product may satisfy the desire temporarily, while the underlying need remains.
So we buy again. And again.
What if we started with the need?
This creates an interesting challenge for marketers.
Instead of asking:
“What product can we create to satisfy this desire?”
we could ask:
“What human need are we actually trying to solve?”
The distinction sounds subtle, but it can completely change the innovation process.
If people need connection, perhaps the answer isn’t another product designed to signal belonging.
If people need freedom, perhaps the answer isn’t simply a more aspirational version of the same thing.
If people need security, perhaps the solution shouldn’t depend on creating anxiety first.
This is where marketing can move from manufacturing desire towards enabling wellbeing.
We also shape values
Marketing doesn’t only influence what people buy.
It influences what people believe is desirable.
Status. Achievement. Beauty. Success. Convenience. Individuality.
But also connection. Creativity. Equality. Community. Environmental protection. Meaning.
The Cambridge material refers to these as different value systems, and highlights an important tension between extrinsic values — external approval, status and reward — and intrinsic values such as relationships, universalism and connection.
Every campaign activates something.
Every brand narrative tells us, implicitly, what kind of person we might become by choosing it.
That makes creativity more powerful than we sometimes give it credit for.
The opportunity
Perhaps the next evolution of marketing isn’t about becoming less persuasive.
It’s about becoming more intentional about what we persuade people towards.
Can we make longevity desirable?
Can we make repair aspirational?
Can we make sharing feel better than owning?
Can we make community more attractive than status?
Can we make wellbeing feel like progress?
These aren’t just sustainability questions.
They are branding questions.
And perhaps that is where the real opportunity lies: not in making sustainability another message brands communicate, but in making better ways of living culturally desirable.
Because if marketing has always helped shape the world people want to live in, we should probably start paying more attention to the world we’re helping them want.
Leave a comment